A lot of what is assumed to be "science" is actually philosophy. Understanding which is which is crucial for thinking and talking clearly about the similarities and differences between religion and science.
Talking Points:
- View #1: If there is conflict, then scientific statements trump religious statements.
- View #2: If there is conflict, then religious statements trump scientific statements.
- View #3: Religious and scientific statements cannot conflict as they are entirely separate domains of inquiry.
- View #4: Religious statements and scientific statements may appear to conflict, but don’t really conflict at the level of the facts when properly understood.
Discussion:
- Initial reactions to this topic? What jumped out at you?
- Why do you think religion and science are often made out to be enemies in our culture?
- Of the four views listed in this topic, which appeals most to you? Explain.
- Why is it important to determine that there actually is a conflict between a religious statement and a scientific statement?
- Do you think it is true that “religion and science are entirely separate domains of inquiry”? Why or why not?
- Is there a step you need to take based on today’s topic?